본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Article View

East Asian Economic Review Vol. 3, No. 2, 1999. pp. 115-131.

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1999.3.2.43

Number of citation : 0

View
484

Download
81

crossmark images crossmark images
PDF PPT Twitter Facebook

The Impact of Preferential Rules of Origin on Trade Defletion in the Regional Trading Bloc

Author

Inkyo Cheong

Creative Commons Attribution License

EAER is an open access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license.

Abstract

At the early stage of the promotion of Korea-Chile FTA, more disputes related to reducing tariff might appear; however, with the consultation going on, the trade union possibly might pay more attention to the rule of origin. The purpose of this research is to emphasize the significance of the special preference of rules of origin which aims at reduce the trade difficulties in FTA, and bring forward the way to reduce the twisted effect of trade by using rules of origin. According to the result of this successful study, the prediction of the economic effect which comes with the decline of tariff between Korea and Japan under the framework of FTA might be different according to whether the rules of origin are considered. The enlightenment of this study is that in order to maximize the economic effect of concluding FTA, a close consultation between the trade union with different preference of origin rule and the leaders of the government is very important.

JEL classification: F13, F14

Keywords

Rules of Origin, Trade Defletion, Regional Trading Bloc

Language

Korean

References

  1. Korea Customs Service. 1994. The NAFTA Rules of Origin. Korea Customs Service. (In Korean)
  2. Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. 1991. Review on EC Rules of Origin. (In Korean)
  3. Song, Y. C. 1997. "Major Issues and Directions with WTO: Harmonization of Rules of Origin", In Kim, K. H., Kim, I. B., Song, Y. C. and H. S. Rhee eds., Major Issues in WTO: Korean Perspective, Policy Analyses 97-13, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  4. Cheong, I. K. 1997. "The Economic Effects of APEC's Closed FTA : Using a CGE Model,” Kyong Je Hak Yon Gu, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129-153. The Korean Economic Association. (In Korean)
  5. Korea International Trade Association. 1994. Review on NAFTA Rules of Origin. (In Korean)
  6. Han, H. Y. 1994. “A Policy assessment of NAFTA's Rules of Origin”, Policy Analyses 94-02, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  7. Han, H. Y. 1995. “APEC and Its Rules of Origin,” Policy Analyses 95-08, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  8. Ju, Jiandong and Kala Krishina. 1996. "Market Access and Welfare Effects of Free Trade Areas without Rules of Origin", NBER Working Paper no. 5480, Cambridge, MD.
  9. Krishina, Kala and Anne Krueger. 1995. "Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection", In New Directions in Trade Theory, A Deardorff, J. Levinsohn and R. Stern(eds.), pp. 149-187, University of Michigan Press.
  10. Krueger, Anne O. 1993. "Free Trade Agreements as Protectionist Devices: Rules of Origin", NBER Working Paper No. 4352, Cambridge, MD.
  11. Lloyd, P. J. 1997. "A tariff substitute for rules of origin in free trade areas", Economic Department, The University of Melbourne, Unpublished Manuscripts.
  12. Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio., Markusen, James R. and Thomas F. Rutherford. 1994. "The Auto Industry and the North American Free Trade Agreement", In Joseph F. Francois and Clinton R. Shiells(eds.), Modeling Trade Policy. Cambridge, MD: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Meade, J. 1955. Trade and Welfare. London: Oxford University Press.
  14. Shibata, H. 1967. "The Theory of Economic Unions: A Comparitive Analysis of Customs Unions, Free Trade Areas, and Tax Unions." In Shoup, C.S.(ed.), Fiscal Harmonization in Common Markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Stankovsky, Jan. 1990. Bedeutung der Ursprungsregedung im AuBenhandel. Studies des Osterreichischin Institute fur Wirtschaftsforschung im Auffrag des Bundesministeriums fur Fimanzem. Wien.
  16. USITC. 1985. The Impact of Rules of Origin on U.S. Imports and Exports. USITC Publication 1695, p 77.
  17. Viner, J. 1950. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.