본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title
1 Economic Impacts of Korea-Chile FTA and Its Implications to Korean Economy  / 1999 /  East Asian Economic Review  / vol.3, no.4, pp.115 / 

10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1999.3.4.54
2  / 2008 /  pp.27 / 

10.1007/978-3-540-79327-4_2

Article View

East Asian Economic Review Vol. 3, No. 4, 1999. pp. 115-136.

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1999.3.4.54

Number of citation : 2

View
440

Download
245

crossmark images crossmark images
PDF PPT Twitter Facebook

Economic Impacts of Korea-Chile FTA and Its Implications to Korean Economy

Author

Inkyo Cheong

Creative Commons Attribution License

EAER is an open access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license.

Abstract

There has been great progress for the Korea-Chile free trade agreement (FTA). During the 1999 Auckland APEC Leaders meeting, leaders of both economy announced that the two countries would begin official negotiations for the FTA between two countries. Following leaders announcement, the first negotiation was made in Santiago December 1999. This paper discusses the backgrounds of Koreas FTA policy, and analyzes the economic effects of the FTA on Korean economy.

JEL classification: F13, F14, F15

Keywords

Korea, Chile, Free Trade Agreement,

Language

Korean

References

  1. Banco Central de Chile. 1999. Economic and Financial Report. July.
  2. Banco Central de Chile. 1998. lndicadores de Comercio Exterior.
  3. Banco Central de Chile. 1998. Boletin Mensual. No. 846.
  4. Cheong, In-Kyo. 1996. “Economic Effects of APEC Trade Liberalization.” Policy Analysis 96-09. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  5. Cheong, In-Kyo. 1997. “Articles: A Study on the Feasibility of Korea's FTA,” Kyong Je Hak Yon Gu, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 139-168. The Korean Economic Association. (In Korean)
  6. Cheong, In-Kyo. 1998. “The Proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements and Implications for Korea,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 3-21. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  7. Cheong, In-kyo. 1999. "Keeping Korea’s FTA Policy Consistent with APEC Goals," Journal of APEC Studies, vol. 1.
  8. Cheong, In-Kyo. 1999. “The Impact of Preferential Rules of Origin on Trade Defletion in the Regional Trading Bloc,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115-131. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  9. Foreign Investment Committee. 1996. Chile - The Place To lnvest ln. Republic of Chile.
  10. Hertel, T. 1998. Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). Purdue University.
  11. Korea Customs and Trade Development Institute. 1999. Tariff schedules of Korea. (In Korean)
  12. Korea International Trade Association. The Trend of Foreign Trade. Various Issues. (In Korean)
  13. Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. 1998. Country Business Report: Chile. (In Korean)
  14. Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. 1998. Country Business Report: Republic of South Africa. (In Korean)
  15. Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. 1998. Trade Report. (In Korean)
  16. Lee, Chang-jae. 1999. 10. 1. "A New Approach towards Enhanced Northeast Asian Economic Cooperation." Paper presented at a conference (The Road to Greater Northeast Asian Econornic Cooperation in the 21st Century). Seoul: KIEP.
  17. Levy, Philip I. 1997. "A Political-Economic Analysis of Free-Trade Agreements," The American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 4, September, pp. 506-519. CrossRef
  18. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 1998. Statistics Yearbook. (In Korean)
  19. OECD. 1995. Regional Integration and the Multilateral Trading System: Synergy and Divergence. Paris.
  20. WTO Secretariat. 1995. Regionalism and the World Trading System. Geneva.
  21. WTO Secretariat. 1995. Trade Policy Review: Chile Report. Geneva.
  22. WT/TPR/S/28. 1997.