본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of the exchange market interventions of the Bank of Korea on the exchange rate of Korean won vis-a-vis US dollar during the 1997 currency crisis. In particular, this paper tests the effects of spot and forward market interventions, using daily intervention data of the Bank of Korea. During the 1997 period, Korea faced two series of crisis in January-March and September-November. It turns out that the spot market intervention was effective in stabilizing the spot market exchange rate at least during the first crisis period. In contrast, there seemed no effect of the forward market intervention. Forward market intervention was rather destabilizing through forward exchange rate during the second crisis period. This implies that even though the forward and sterilized spot market interventions are equivalent in their effect on exchange rate, these two instruments can widely diverge from each other under the circumstances of exchange rate volatility and speculation.

JEL classification: F31, F33

Keywords

forward exchange, foreign exchange control, currency crisis, Korea

Language

Korean

References

  1. Baillie, Richard T. and Owen F. Humpage. 1992. "Post-Louvre Intervention: Did Target Zone Stabilize the Dollar?" Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper no. 9203.
  2. Baillie, Richard T. and William P. Osterberg. 1997. "Central Bank Intervention and Risk in the Forward Market," Journal of International Economics, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 483-497.
  3. Bank of Korea. 1999. Investigation Result Report on IMF Financial Crisis. (in Korean)
  4. BIS. 1999. Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivative Activity 1998.
  5. Bosner-Neal, C. 1996. "Dose Central Bank Intervention Stabilize Foreign Exchange Rates?" Economic Review, vol. 1996, pp. 43-57, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  6. Choi, C. K. 1994. “A Study on the Effect the Sterilized Foreign Exchange Rate Market Intervention,” BOK Working Papers no. 72, The Bank of Korea. (in Korean)
  7. Choi, C. K. 1995. “The Analysis of the Dynamic Effect of the Sterilized Foreign Exchange Rate Market Intervention,” Economic Analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69-101. (in Korean)
  8. Diebold, F. and M. Nerlove. 1989. "The Dynamics of Exchange Rate Volatility: A Multivariate Latent Factor ARCH Model," Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-21.
  9. Dominguez, K. 1992. "The Informational Role of Official Foreign Exchange Intervention Operarations: The Signalling Hypothesis," In K. Dominguez, Exchange Intervention Efficiency and the Behavior of International Asset Markets. New York: Gerland.
  10. Dominguez, K. 1993. "Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?" NBER Working Paper no. 4532.
  11. Dominguez, K. and J. Frankel. 1992. "Dose Foreign Exchange Intervention Matter? Disentangling the Portfolio and Expectations Effects," Center for International and Development Economics Research Working Paper no. c92-001. Berkeley: University of California.
  12. Dominguez, K. and J. Frankel. 1993. Does Foreign Exchange Intervention Work? Institute for International Economics.
  13. Edison, Hali J. 1993. "The Effectiveness of Central-Bank Intervention: A Survey of the Literature after 1982," Special Papers in International Economics. Princeton University.
  14. Fatum, R. and M. M. Hutchison. 1999. "Is Intervention a Signal of Future Monetary Policy? Evidence from the Federal Funds Futures Market," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 54-69.
  15. FNTIMES. 1999. Is the World Bank Report True? 12. April. (in Korean)
  16. Garber, P. 1998. "Derivatives in International Capital Flows," NBER Working Paper no. 6623.
  17. Garber, P. and M. Spencer. 1995. "Foreign Exchange Hedging and the Interest Rate Defense," IMF Staff Papers, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 490-516.
  18. Garber, P. and M. Spencer. 1996. "Derivative Products in Exchange Rate Crises," Paper presented at the Federal Bank of San Francisco's conference on Managing Capital Flows and Exchange Rates: Lessons from the Pacific Basin. (September 26-27)
  19. Huang, Juann H. 1995. "Intervention Strategies and Exchange Rate Volatility: A Noise Trading perspective," Research Paper no. 9515. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  20. Jurgenson, P. 1983. Report of the Working Group on Exchange Market Intervention. Washington: Treasury Department.
  21. Kim, E. J. 1993. “Effectiveness of Foreign Exchange Market Intervention after the Market Average Exchange Rate System,” Research Paper, Samsung Economic Research Institute. (in Korean)
  22. Kim, I. J. and Y. S. Rhee. 1998. “The Korean Currency and Banking Crisis and an Evaluation of the IMF Program,” Journal of Money and Finance, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 247-293. (in Korean)
  23. Klein, Michael W. and Eric Rosengren. 1991. "Foreign Exchange Intervention as a Signal of Monetary Policy," New England Economic Review, vol. 1991, pp. 39-50. May/June.
  24. Lall, S. 1997. "Speculative Attacks, Forward Market Intervention and the Classic Bear Squeeze," IMF Working Paper no. 164.
  25. Lastrapes, William D. 1989. "Exchange Rate Volatility and U.S. Monetary Policy: An ARCH Application," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66-77.
  26. Lee, S. H., Rhee, Y. S. and C. K. Choi. 1998. “Foreign Exchange Intervention and Exchange Rate Stability in Korea,” Kukje Kyungje Yongu, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49-68. (in Korean)
  27. Loopesko, Bonnie. 1984. "Relationships among Exchange Rates, Intervention, and Interest Rates: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257-277.
  28. Moon, Woosik. 2000. The Causes of the Korean Currency Crisis: Policy Mistakes Reexamined. Korea Review of Applied Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93-118.
  29. Park, D. K. and C. Y. Rhee. 1998. "Currency Crisis in Korea: Unfolding Process and Lessons," KYONG JE HAK YON GU, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 351-389.(in Korean)
  30. Rhee, Y. S. 1995. “The Mechanism and Effect of Foreign Exchange Intervention Policy in Korea,” In I. J. Kim, J. Y. Park. eds, Capital Liberalization: Theory and Reality, chapter 3. Seoul: Bubmunsa. (in Korean)
  31. Rhee, Y. S. 1997. “On the Effects of Foreign Exchange Market Intervention,” Journal of Money and Finance, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35-60. (in Korean)
  32. Roger, S. 1993. "The Management of Foreign Exchange Reserves," BIS Economic Papers, no. 28.
  33. Shin, I. S. 1999. “On the Mechanics of the Korean Currency Crisis,” KDI Journal of Economic Policy, vol. 20, no. 3-4. pp. 3-62. (in Korean)
  34. Takagi, Sjinji. 1991. "Foreign Exchange Market Intervention and Domestic Monetary Control in Japan, 1973-89," Japan and the World Economy, vol. 3, pp. 147-180.
  35. Vrolijk, C. 1998. "Derivatives Effect on Monetary Policy Transmission," IMF Working Paper no. 121.
  36. Watanabe, Tsutomu. 1992. "The Signalling Effect of Foreign Exchange Intervention: The Case of Japan," Paper presented at the Conference on Exchange Rate Policy in Pacific Basin Countries, sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (Sep. 16-18)
  37. Yun, C. H. 1999. An Analysis on the Mechanism of Speculative Attack in Foreign Exchange Market. Paper presented for the conference of the Korea Money and Finance Association. (in Korean)