본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

A North-South country model with imitation, innovation and simplified tariff structure is developed in this paper. Peculiar to this paper is that effects of change in trade policy on imitation and innovation in steady-state is analyzed. Specifically, two mechanisms through which trade affects imitation and innovation are noticed. First, higher trade barrier leads to higher imitation and innovation cost but higher gain if succeed in imitation and/or innovation in Southern country. Second, higher tariff lowers profit of Northern firms. Therefore, net effect on imitation and innovation in Southern country is ambiguous while innovation effort is likely to shrink in Northern country. Numerical solutions of the equilibrium system reveal the followings. Innovation and imitation activity is generally bigger in free trade, which is generally in line with theoretical expectation. It is also found that assumption on relative cost structure of imitation to innovation is crucial. In particular, if relative cost of innovation to imitation becomes lower due to higher trade barrier in Southern country, Southern innovation turns out to keep growing with higher level of tariff protection. Nevertheless, it is noticed that aggregate innovation activity in the world monotonically decreases as tariff rate goes higher.

JEL classification: F13, F18, O31

Keywords

Imitation, Innovation, International Trade

Language

English

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P. and F. Zilibotti. 2002. "Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth," NBER Working Paper no. 9066, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and J. Vickers. 2001. "Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation," Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.
  3. Aghion, P., Harris, C. and J. Vickers. 1997. "Competition and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation: An Example," European Economic Review, vol. 41, pp. 771-782.
  4. Cameron, G. 2000. "The Sun also Rises: Productivity Convergence between Japan and the U.S.A.," Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper no. 45.
  5. Currie, David., Levine, Paul., Pearlman, Joseph. and Michael Chui. 1999. "Phases of Imitation and Innovation in a North-South Endogenous Growth Model," Oxford Economic Papers, Jan. 1999.
  6. Barro, Robert. 1974. "Are Government Bond Net Wealth?" Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 1095-1117. CrossRef
  7. Findlay, Ronald. 1978. "Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology, A Simple Dynamic Model," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
  8. Glass, Amy. 2000. "Imitation as a Stepping Stone to Innovation," Ohio State University working paper.
  9. Glass, Amy. 1997. "Product Cycles and Market Penetration," International Economic Review, vol. 38, pp. 865-91.
  10. Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman. 1991a. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press.
  11. Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman. 1991b. "Quality Ladders and Product Cycles," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, pp. 557-586.
  12. Kim, Linsu. 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Client Distribution Service.
  13. Park, Sungik. 2004. "Imitation to Innovation: The Case of Korea," Working Paper.
  14. Park, Woohee and Yongho Bae. 1996. "Korea's Technological Development," Suhnam Korean Economic Research, vol. 2, Kyungmoon. (In Korean)
  15. Perez-Sebastian, Fidel. 1998. "Transitional Dynamics in an R&D-Based Growth Model with Imitation: Comparing its Predictions to the Data," Universidad Publica de Navarra working paper.
  16. Romer, Paul. 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. S71-S102. CrossRef
  17. Segerstrom. P. 1991. "Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, pp. 807-827. CrossRef
  18. Segerstrom. P., Anant, T. C. A. and E. Dinopoulos. 1990. "A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle," American Economic Review, vol. 80, pp. 1077-1091.
  19. Stokke, Hildegunn. 2004. "The Allocation between Innovation and Imitation during Growth," Norwegian University of Science and Technology working paper.
  20. Van Elkan, R. 1996. "Catching Up and Slowing Down, Learning and Growth Patterns in an Open Economy," Journal of International Economics, 41, pp 95-112. CrossRef