본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This paper employs a simple intertemporal optimization model to analyze the optimal growth and borrowing for a small open economy with non-­convex technology that imports intermediate inputs for production. Unlike other papers in the literature, this paper concludes that there is only one path for an open economy to achieve optimal growth: namely, the pursuit of the highest possible steady-state capital-labor ratio. Thus, a country in a region of low capital intensity can achieve high long run economic growth by putting itself on a locally unstable path. By setting a high marginal opportunity cost of investment, a country can achieve higher long run output. An economy cannot become a creditor if it starts as a net debtor. Moreover, if an unanticipated permanent deterioration in the terms of trade occurs, the economy should decrease investments in order to improve its current accounts.

JEL classification: O1, O41

Keywords

Economic Growth, Borrowing, Non-convex Technology

Language

English

References

  1. Abel, A., and O. Blanchard. 1983. "An intertemporal model of saving and investment," Econometrica, vol. 51, pp. 675-692. CrossRef
  2. Askenazy, P., and C. Le Van. 1999. "A Model of Optimal Growth Strategy," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 85, pp. 24-51. CrossRef
  3. Arrow, K. 1962. "The economic implications of learning by doing," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, pp. 155-173. CrossRef
  4. Arrow, K., and M. Kurz. 1970. Public Investment, the Rate of Return and Optimal Fiscal Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  5. Bazdarich, M. 1978. "Optimal growth and stages in the balance of payments," Journal of International Economics, vol. 8, pp. 425-443. CrossRef
  6. Bruno, M. 1982. "Adjustment and structural change under raw material price shocks," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 84, pp. 199-221. CrossRef
  7. Butlin, M. 1985. "Imported inputs in an optimizing model of a small open economy," Journal of International Economics, vol. 18, pp. 101-121. CrossRef
  8. Dechert, D. and K. Nishimura 1983. "A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregate model with a non-concave production function," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 31, pp. 332-354. CrossRef
  9. Eisner, R. and R. Strotz. 1963. Determinants of Business Investment. In Impact of Monetary Policy, complied by the Commission on Money and Credit. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
  10. Findlay, R. and C. Rodriguez. 1977. "Intermediate imports and macroeconomic policy under flexible exchange rates," Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 10, pp. 208-217. CrossRef
  11. Gaines, R. and J. Peterson. 1985. "The existence of optimal consumption policies in optimal economic growth models with nonconvex technologies," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 37, pp. 76-98. CrossRef
  12. Hung, C., Le Van, C., and Michel, P. 2006. "Non-convex Aggregate Technology and Optimal Economic Growth," Mimeo. University of Laval, Canada.
  13. Laursen, S. and L. Metzler. 1950. "Flexible exchange rates and the theory of employment," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 32, pp. 281-299. CrossRef
  14. Lucas, R. 1967. "Adjustment costs and the theory of supply," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 75, pp. 321-334. CrossRef
  15. Matsuyama, K. 1987. "Current account dynamics in a finite horizon model," Journal of International Economics, vol. 23, pp. 299-313. CrossRef
  16. Majumdar, M. and T. Mitra. 1982. "Intertemporal allocation with non convex technology, the aggregate framework," Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 27, pp. 101-136. CrossRef
  17. Obstfeld, M. 1980. "Intermediate imports, the terms of trade and the dynamics of the exchange rate and the current account," Journal of International Economics, vol. 10, pp. 461-480. CrossRef
  18. Obstfeld, M. 1982a. "Transitory terms of trade shocks and the current account deficit: the case of constant time preference," Discussion Paper No. 121. Columbia University, New York.
  19. Obstfeld, M. 1982b. "Aggregate spending and the terms of trade, is there a Laursen Metzler effect?" Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 97, pp. 251- 270. CrossRef
  20. Obstfeld, M. 1983. "Intertemporal price speculation and the optimal current account deficit," Journal of Internal Money and Finance, vol. 2, pp. 135-146. CrossRef
  21. Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff, 1995. "The Intertemporal Apporach to the Current Account," In G. Grossman and K. Rogoff eds. Handbook of International Economics, pp. 1731-1799.
  22. Persson, T. and L. Svensson, 1985. "Current account dynamics and the terms of trade, Harberger-Laursen-Metzler two generations later," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, pp. 43-65. CrossRef
  23. Romer, Paul M. 1986. "Increasing returns and long run growth," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, pp. 1002-1037. CrossRef
  24. Sachs, J. 1981. "The current account and macro­economic adjustment in the 1970’s," Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1, pp. 201­-282. CrossRef
  25. Skiba, A. 1978. "Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function," Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 527-540. CrossRef
  26. Svensson, L. 1984. "Oil price and a small oil­importing economy’s welfare and the current account," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 99, pp. 649-­672.
  27. Svensson, L. and A. Razin, 1983. "The terms of trade and the current account, the Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect." Journal of Political Economy, vol. 91, pp. 97-125. CrossRef
  28. Uzawa, Hirafumi. 1968. "Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings." In J. N. Wolfe ed. Value, Capital Growth: papers in honour of John Hicks, Edingurgh: Edinburgh University Press.