본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impact of the Uruguay Round (UR) implementation on world agriculture using a multi-regional general equilibrium model and the mapping function of the Geographic Information System (GIS). The results of this study show that the Uruguay Round has had a negative impact on world agriculture in the light of total food production and food distribution. For commodities such as grains, while grain production rises in exporting countries, the effect is not sufficient to cover the fall in production in importing countries. In particular, the impact is serious on food security in importing countries of agricultural products. The negative impact is almost concentrated in importing countries, particularly Japan, the European Union (EU) and South Korea. As is clearly visible on the maps produced by the GIS function, the real state of world agriculture as well as the results evaluated by this Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model has changed negatively in major importing countries and particularly the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Sub-Saharan Africa following the Uruguay Round.

JEL classification: F13, L66,

Keywords

Uruguay round, Multi-regional General Equilibrium Model, World Food Production, Food Security, Geographic Information System

Language

English

References

  1. Abbott, P. and A. Morse. 1999. TRQ implementation in Developing Countries. WTO/WB conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda from a Development Perspective: Interests and options in the WTO 2000 negotiations. Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger. "An economic theory of GATT," The American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 215-248. CrossRef
  3. Kim, Chung-sil. 2001. "The Economic Effects of Korea-Chile Free Trade Agreement Using CGE Model," Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 438-456, Korean Agricultural Policy Association.
  4. Diaz-Bonilla, E., Thomas, M., Robinson, S. and A. Cattaneo. 2000. "Food security and trade negotiations in the World Trade Organization: A cluster analysis of country Groups," TMD Discussion paper no. 59, Washington DC.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  5. FAO. 1999. "Assessment of the impact of the Uruguay Round on Agricultural markets and food security," CCP 99/12 Rev, Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, (update to CCP document no. 99/12, October 1999).
  6. Finger, M. J., Ingco, M. and U. Reincke. 1996. The Uruguay Round: Statistics on Tariff Concessions Given and Received. World Bank.
  7. Francois, J. F., McDonald, B. and H. Norstrom. 1996. "A users guide to the Uruguay Round Assessments," Working paper no. ERAD-96-003, World Trade Organization.
  8. Francois, J. F., McDonald, B. and H. Norstrom. 1996. "Assessing the Uruguay Round," In W. Martin and A. Winters eds. The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. World Bank Discussion Papers no. 307.
  9. Harrison, G., Rutherford, T. and D. Tarr. 1995. "Quantifying the Outcome of the Uruguay Round," Finance and Development, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 38-41.
  10. Hertel, T. W. ed. 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modelling and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Hertel, T., Martin, W., Yangishima, K. and B. Dimaran. 1995. "Liberalizing Manufactures Trade in a Changing World Economy," Paper presented at the Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, a World Bank conference, 26-27 January, Washington.
  12. Cheong, In-Kyo. 2000. "A Study on the Feasibility of Economic Integration in the Northeast Asia," The Korean Economic Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89-105.
  13. Lee, Jong-Eun. 2002. "China's Accession to the World Trade Organization: Implication on the Korean Economy," Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 133-152.
  14. Martin, W. and A. Winters. 1996. The Uruguay Round and developing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. OECD. 1997. The Uruguay Round Agreement on agriculture and processed agricultural products. Paris: OECD.