- About EAER
- For Authors
- Journal Archive
- Conference Archive
- Publication Ethics
- Indexing & Abstracting
- EAER Best Paper Award
- News & Events
All Papers are subject to peer review. As the journal operates a double-blind review process, any indication of the authors’ identities are removed from the manuscript.
< EAER Double-blind Peer-review Process >
If there are conflicting decisions between referees, the Editor-in-Chief has the full right to decide whether the manuscript will be published in the journal.
The peer-review process takes approximately 8-12 weeks.
- Process for the Identification of and Dealing with Allegations of Research Misconduct
When the journal faces suspected cases of research and publication misconduct such as a redundant (duplicate) publication, plagiarism, fabricated data, changes in authorship, undisclosed conflicts of interest, an ethical problem discovered with the submitted manuscript, a reviewer who has appropriated an author’s idea or data, complaints against editors, and other issues, the resolving process will follow the Code of Ethics for EAER and the flowchart provided by the COPE. The EAER editorial board will discuss the suspected cases and reach a decision.
- Ensuring Content Integrity
CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the CrossMark logo, EAER is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the CrossMark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.