본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Abstract

Foreign direct investment is an effective way for Korea to overcome foreign exchange crisis and strengthen Korea economy by smooth flow of international capital. Since the implementation of the reform issues in South Korea was poor, coupled with rigid factor markets, government regulation and other barriers, as well as the lack of investor relations management system, make foreign direct investment stagnant. In order to accelerate the foreign investment, Korea should accelerate structural reforms, expansion of foreign investment liberalization, strengthen management, investor relations, giving the chance for a full use of international investment norms - Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI). It is also necessary to stimulate investment in the existing system to focus on increasing employment and regional development. However, in the implementation of the liberalization measures, it is necessary to deal with side effects through the establishment of competition policy and other related systems, and make thorough preparation

JEL classification: F21, F23

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Korea, Multilateral Agreement on Investment

Language

Korean

References

  1. Kim, K. -H. 1997. “The Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Implications and policy Recommendations,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45-80. (in Korean)
  2. Kim, J. 1996. “Economic Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in Korea,” Policy References 96-09, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  3. Wang, Y. 1997. “Liberalization of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions in Korea: Economic Impacts and Policy Recommendations,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81-123 (in Korean)
  4. Lee, H. 1994 “Foreign Direct Investment and Investment Policy,” Research Report 94-06, Seoul: Korea Development Institute (in Korean)
  5. Bartik, T. J. 1994. "Jobs, Productivity and Local Economic Development, What Implications Does Economic Research Have for the Role of Government?," National Tax Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 847-861.
  6. Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D. and J. Lee. 1995. "How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?," NBER Working Paper No. 5057.
  7. Coughlin, C. C., Terza, J. V. and V. Arromdee. 1991. "State Characteristics and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment Within the United States," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 675-683.
  8. Dunning, J. H. 1995. "Reappraising The Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism," Journal of Internaional Business Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 461-491.
  9. Friedman, J., Gerlowski, D. A. and J. Silberman. 1992. "What Attracts Foreign Multinational Corporations? Evidence from Branch Plant Location in the United States," Journal of Regional Science, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 403-418.
  10. Hines, J. R. Jr. 1996. "Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America," American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1076-1094.
  11. McGuire, T. J. 1986. "Interstate Tax Differentials, Tax Competition, and Tax Policy," National Tax Journal, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 367-373.
  12. Newman, R. J. and D. H. Sullivan. 1988. "Econometric Analysis of Business Tas Impacts on Industrial Location, What Do We Know, and How Do We Know It?," Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 215-234.
  13. Rivera-Batiz, F.L. and L.A. Rivera-Batiz. 1994. "Europe 1992 and the Liberalization of Direct Investment Flows, Services versus Manufacturing," International Economic Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45-57.
  14. USTR. 1997. 1997 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers. Washington, D.C.: United States Trade Representative.