본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title
1 Economic Impacts of Korea-Chile FTA and Its Implications to Korean Economy  / 1999 /  East Asian Economic Review  / vol.3, no.4, pp.115 / 

10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1999.3.4.54

Article View

East Asian Economic Review Vol. 2, No. 4, 1998. pp. 3-21.

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.29

Number of citation : 1

View
415

Download
90

crossmark images crossmark images
PDF PPT Twitter Facebook

The Proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements and Implications for Korea

Author

In-Kyo Cheong

Creative Commons Attribution License

EAER is an open access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license.

Abstract

After the WTO system came into effect, the trend of signing new regional trade agreement also lasts. Every county has been positively using regional trade agreements at the strategy level. In order to minimize the loss caused by treading the countries out of the preference trade agreement differently, WTO regulated the level allowed in regional trade agreement. But actually, the way that eliminates the different factors of the countries out of the regional trade agreement through WTO has its limitation. Therefore, it is necessary for Korea to change its position in the direction of insuring the economic substantial results by way of signing regional trade agreement positively.

JEL classification: F13, F15, F53

Keywords

Regional Trade Agreements, WTO, Free Trade Agreement

Language

Korean

References

  1. Won, Y. 1997. "Increasing Regionalism and the WTO System," International Trade Law, vol. 13, pp. 6-35. (in Korean)
  2. Cheong, I. 1997. “Study of Economic Feasibility in Establishing Korea's Small Scale FTZ,” Korean Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 45, no. 4. pp. 3-31. (in Korean)
  3. Cheong, I. 1998. “Study of Economic Feasibility of Korea-US FTA,” Economy of the Americas, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44-62. (in Korean)
  4. Bhagwati, J. 1993. "Regionalism and Multilateralism: an Overview". In New Dimensions in Regional Integration. De Melo, J. and A. Panagariya eds. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bergsten, C. F. 1996. "Globalizing Free Trade." Foreign Affairs. vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 105-120.
  6. Bergsten, C. F. 1997. Open Regionalism. Institute for International Economics. Working Paper 97-3.
  7. Bhagwati, J. 1993. "Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview". In New Demensions in Regional Integration. J. de Melo and A. Panagariya, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Krugman, P. 1991. "Is Bilateralism Bad?" In E. Helpman and A. Razin eds. International Trade and Trade Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 9-23.
  9. Levy, P. I. 1997. "A Political-Economic Analysis of Free Trade Agreements." American Economic Review, vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 506-519
  10. Thurow, L. 1992. Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe and America. New York: William Morrow.
  11. Viner, J. 1950. The Customs Unions Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. New York.
  12. WTO. 1995. Regionalism and the World Trading System. WTO Secretariat.