본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

After 10 years of transition in Central and Eastern European Economies, restructuring and privatization have strengthened the banking system in Hungary and Poland more than that in the Czech Republic. The three banking systems continued to receive sizable foreign capital inflows, but exposures to Russia uncovered the fragilities for the largely state-owned Czech banks and have prompted the authorities to re-launch the bank privatization process. Capital inflows supported strong loan growth in Hungary and Poland, while competition has led to declining profits and a search for higher yields through lending to the small and medium-sized corporate and consumer segments. This three countries have strengthened their regulatory and supervisory frameworks, but significant challenge remain as they face the prospect of full capital account liberalization and contemplate joining the EU.

JEL classification: F43. O52

Keywords

Eastern Europe, Central Europe, Banking System

Language

Korean

References

  1. ABN AMRO. 1999. Equity Central Europe.
  2. Sheng, Andrew. 1996. Bank restructuring : lessons from the 1980s, Volume 1. The World Bank. CrossRef
  3. The Banker Database. 1999. Financial Times. (July)
  4. Bank for International Settlements. 1997. "Core principles for effective banking supervision." Basle: Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements. CrossRef
  5. Bank for International Settlements. 1999. 69th Annual Report. Basle: Bank for International Settlements. (June)
  6. Buch, Claudia M. 1996. Creating Efficient Banking Systems: Theory and Evidence from Eastern Europe. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  7. Begg, David K. H. 1996. "Monetary policy in Central and Eastern Europe: lessons after half a decade of transition." IMF Working Paper 96/108. IMF.
  8. EBRD. Transition Report. Various issues.
  9. Group of Ten. 1997. "A Strategy for the formulation, adoption and implementation of sound principles and practices to strengthen financial systems." Report of the Group of Ten(G-I0). Working Party on Financial Stability in Emerging Markets.
  10. GuCalvo, G., Kumar, M. S., Borensztein, E. and Paul R. Masson. 1993. "Financial Sector Reforms and Exchange Arrangements in Eastern Europe." IMF Occasional Paper No. 102. February 15, 1993.
  11. Han, J.-C. 1998. “Resolving Bad Loans in Central and Eastern Europe: The Cases of Hungary, Poland and Czech Republic,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 219-255. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  12. Han, J.-C. 1999. “The Possibility of Central and Eastern European Countries' Joining the EMU: Prospects and Implications for Korea,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 103-154. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  13. Han, J.-C. and M. C. Cho. 1999. “A New Approach to the Economic Integration between South and North Korea: A Comparative Study with the Transition Economies in Eastern Europe,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133-171. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean) CrossRef
  14. Temprano-Arroyo, Heliodoro and Robert A. Feldrnan. 1998. Selected Transition and Mediterranean Countries: An Institutional Primer on EMU and EU Relations. IMF Working Paper 98/82. June 01, 1998. CrossRef
  15. International Monetary Fund. 1998. International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues. September.
  16. International Monetary Fund. 1999. International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues. September.
  17. International Monetary Fund. 1999. International Financial Statistics. September.
  18. Kornai, Janos. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford University Press.
  19. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. 1994. Handbook on Poland. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  20. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. 1995. Handbook on Hungary. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (In Korean)
  21. OECD. 1995. Economic Surveys: 1995 Hungary. Paris.
  22. OECD. 1997. The New Banking Landscape in Central and Eastern Europe: Country Experience and Policies for the Future (OECD proceedings). Paris.
  23. OECD. 1998a. Economic Surveys: 1998 Poland. Paris.
  24. OECD. 1998b. Economic Surveys: The Czech Republic. Paris.
  25. OECD. 1999. Economic Surveys: 1999 Hungary. Paris.
  26. The Bank of Korea. 1999. Bank Restructuring in Emerging Economies. (In Korean)
  27. The Bank of Korea. 1999. Lessons from the Changes of Financial Systems in Major Transition Countries. Research Report 99-17. (In Korean)
  28. Van Elkan, Rachel. 1998. “Financial Markets in Hungary.” In Cottarelli, Carlo et al eds. Hungary: Economic Policies for Sustainable Growth, IMF Occasional Paper 159, pp. 81-91.
  29. Van Wijnbergen, Sweder. 1996. “Bank Restructuring and Enterprise Reform.” Paper presented at the EBRD Conference on Policy Studies to Promote Private Sector Development. London. (April)