본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title
1  / 2018 /  pp.21 / 

10.1007/978-981-10-7113-3_2

Abstract

The World Trade Organization (WTO) established a Working Group on the interaction between trade and competition policy in 1996. By the Doha Ministerial Declaration, it recognized the case for international competition policy framework and agreed that the relevant negotiations take place after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference. The Working Group is meant to focus on the clarification of: core principles, including transparency, non-discrimination and procedural fairness among others in the period until the Fifth Session. This article attempts to clarify the implications of the core (WTO) principles to the would-be international competition laws and practices. It further tries to get lessons from competition law and practices of the European Community. Protection of fundamental rights, proportionality, non-discrimination, transparency, supremacy, subsidiarity and direct effect are the general principles of the European Community law to be discussed in relation to the competition law and policy. It concludes that the general principles of the WTO and EC laws provide guiding principles for the future international competition norms, and makes some preliminary assessment of the present Korean competition law and policy in the light of those principles.

JEL classification: F13, K33

Keywords

International Competition Norms, World Trade Organization (WTO), European Community laws

Language

Korean

References

  1. Korea Fair Trade Commission. 2002. Emerging WTO Competition Round and ICN and Its Implications. Korea Fair Trade Commission. (in Korean)
  2. Korea Fair Trade Commission. 2002. Business Program for 2002. Korea Fair Trade Commission. (in Korean)
  3. Yun, M. K. 2000. “Discussion for Establishment of International Competition Policy in WTO New Round and Its Implications for Korea,” International Trade Law, vol. 2000, no. 36, pp. 9-42. (in Korean)
  4. Chung, C. M. 1996. “Case 26/62, An Analysis on Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen,” In Choon-Ho PARK eds. A Study of International Case Law, JinSeongSa, pp. 403-417. (in Korean)
  5. Chung, C. M. 2002. “A Study on WTO New Round and the Competition Policy,” Trade Remedy Review, vol. 2002, no. 6, pp. 90-111, Spring. (in Korean)
  6. Han, C. K. 2002. “Privatization and Fair Competition,” Paper presented for Policy Seminar on Competition Policy and Fair Competition in Network Industry, 2002, 6. 3., Korea Academic Society of Industrial Organization. (in Korean)
  7. WTO. 1997-2001. Reports of The Working Group on The Interaction Between Trade and Competition Policy to The General Council.
  8. WTO. 1999. The Fundamental WTO Principles of National Treatment, Most-Favoured- Nation Treatment and Transparency, WT/WGTCP/W/114, April, 14.
  9. WTO. 1999. Communication from the European Community and its Member States, WT/WGTCP/W/115, May, 25.
  10. WTO. 2001. Doha Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1.
  11. WTO. 1996. Singapore Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(96)/DEC.
  12. Paul Craig and G. de Burca. 1998. EU Law. Oxford.
  13. Alison, Jones and Sufrin Brenda. 2001. EC Competition Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Temple, Lang J. 1991. The Sphere in which Member States are Obliged to Comply with the General Principles of Law and Community Fundamental Rights Principles. Legal Issues of European Integration, pp. 23-35.
  15. Usher, J. 1998. General Principles of EC Law. Longman.