본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical framework which demonstrates how the structures of corporate internal labor markets are formed within the broader labor and capital market context in the U.S. and Japan. This framework is then used to evaluate labor markets within Korean companies and to identify points of change which might promote greater efficiency. Prior to the Asian economic crisis, Korean conglomerates had large, closed internal labor markets. However, in the aftermath of the crisis, they have pursued structural downsizing and moved to open their labor markets. The empirical evidence introduced in this paper affirms the argument that the first step toward creating a flexible labor market in Korea should begin with establishing an efficient corporate governance structure. This implies that a simple switch from the Japanese paradigm for human resource management to an Anglo-American model or vice-versa may not improve internal labor market performance unless the change is accompanied by a solution to the problems posed by the minority controlling structure of Korean companies. The implications of this study for guiding policy in developing countries having labor market rigidities and underdeveloped corporate governance is clear. Capital market structure and corporate governance systems may provide an appropriate starting point for the development of any policies aimed at building an efficient human resource management system and a flexible labor market.

JEL classification: J45, J53, J62

Keywords

Internal Labor Markets, Minority controlling structure

Language

Korean

References

  1. Jeong, I. S., Keum, J.-H., Cho, J. M. and D. B. Kim. 2002. “Changes in the Internal Labor Market in Corporations,” Labor Market & Employment Policies 2003-12, Korea Labor Institute. (In Korean)
  2. Keum, J.-H. and J. M. Cho. 1998. “Articles: A Study on the Causes and Patterns of Job Separation,” Korean Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 163-194. (In Korean)
  3. Kim, S. S. 2002. “The Characteristics of Japanese Vocational Education and Training System and Its Recent Changes,” The Korean Labor Economic Association Proceedings of 2002 Winter Conference, The Korean Labor Economic Association. (In Korean)
  4. Jeong, I. S. 2003. “Changes in Internal Corporate Job Marke,” Proceedings of 2003 Economics Joint Conference. (In Korean)
  5. Cho, J. M. 1998. Labor Adjustment in U.S. and Its Implications. Korea Labor Institute. (In Korean)
  6. Cho, J. M. 2003. “A Study on the Labor Law and Labor Relations for the Flexicurity Improvement of Korea's Labor Market,” Paper presented for the Ahnmin Forum on “the Labor Issue: What is the Solution?,” Ahnmin Institute for Public Policy. (In Korean)
  7. Amit, R. and J. Livnat. 1988. "Diversification Strategies, Business Cycles and Economic Performance," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9, pp. 99-110.
  8. Aoki, M. 1990. "Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, pp. 1-27.
  9. Baysinger, B. D. and R. E. Hoskisson. 1989. "Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Large Multi-product Firms," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 310-332. CrossRef
  10. Bebchuk, Lucian Arye. 1990. Corporate Law and Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Boyacigiller, N. and N. J. Adler. 1991. "The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context," Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, pp. 262-290.
  12. Brozen, Yale. 1974. "Entry Barriers: Advertising and Product Differentiation," In The New Learning. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
  13. Cho, Joonmo and Jaeho Keum. 2003. "Job Instability in the Korean Labor Market: Comparison before and after the 1997 Financial Crisis," International Labour Review, vol. 143, pp. 45-90. (Forthcoming)
  14. Comanor, William S. and Thomas Wilson. 1974. Advertising and Market Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Comanor, William S. 1979. "The Effect of Advertising on Competition, A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 453-476.
  16. Demsetz, Harold. 1974. "Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly," In Harvey Goldschmidt et al. eds., Industrial Concentration: The New Learning. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
  17. Dore, R. P. 1987. Taking Japan Seriously. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  18. Gerlach, M. L. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Hill, C. W. L. 1988. "Internal Capital Market Controls and Financial Performance in Multi-divisional Firm," Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 32, pp. 197-212.
  20. Horiuchi, A., Packer, F. and S. Fukuda. 1988. "What Role has the "Main Bank" Played in Japan?," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159-180. CrossRef
  21. Hoskisson, R. E., Harrison, J. S. and D. A. Dubofsky. 1991. "Capital Market Evaluation of M-Form Implementation and Diversification Strategy," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 271-279. CrossRef
  22. Hoskisson, R. E., and M. A. Hitt. 1988. "Strategic Control Systems and Relative R & D Investment in Large Multiproduct Firms," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 605-621. CrossRef
  23. Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A. and D. D. Moesel. 1994. "Corporate Diverstiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms, The Effects of Governance, Strategy and Performance," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 32-52. CrossRef
  24. Hoskisson, R. E., and T. A. Turk. 1990. "Corporate Restructuring: Governance and Control Limits of the Internal Market," Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 459-477. CrossRef
  25. Karier, Thomas. 1984. "The Union Impact on Profits, Productivity and Prices," Ph. D. dissertation. University of California Berkeley.
  26. Karier, Thomas. 1985. "Union and Monopoly Profits," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 34-42.
  27. Kester, W. C. 1991. Japanese Takeovers: The Global Contest for Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School.
  28. Kim, Hicheon and Robert E. Hoskisson. 1997. "Market (United States) versus Managed (Japanese) Governance," In Corporate Governance: Economic and Financial Issues, Ch. 8, pp. 174-199, Oxford University Press.
  29. Koike, K. 1988. Understanding Industrial Relations in Modern Japan. St. Martin’s Press.
  30. Lewellen, W. 1971. "A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger," Journal of Finance, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 521-537. CrossRef
  31. Leibenstein, Harvey. 1966. "Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency," American Economic Review, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 393-415.
  32. Lincoln, J. R. 1990. "Japanese Organization and Organization Theory," In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, pp. 255-294.
  33. Mann, Michael. 1974. "Advertising, Concentration and Profitability: The State of Knowledge and Directions for Public Policy," In Harvey Goldschmidt et al. eds. Industrial Concentration: The New Learning. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
  34. Mansfield, E. 1988. "Industrial R & D in Japan and the United States: A Comparative Study," American Economic Review, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 223-228.
  35. McMillan, C. J. 1985. The Japanese Industrial System. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  36. Pozen, R. C. 1994. "Institutional Investors: The Reluctant Activists," Harvard Business Review, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 140-149.
  37. Prowse, S. D. 1990. "Institutional Investment Patterns and Corporate Financial Behavior in the United States and Japan," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 43-66. CrossRef
  38. Prowse, S. D. 1992. "The Structure of Ownership in Japan," Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1121-1140. CrossRef
  39. Quinn, D. P. and P. Rivoli. 1991. "The Effects of American- and Japanese- Style Employment and Compensation Practices on Innovation," Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 323-341. CrossRef
  40. Russo, M. V. 1991. "The Multidivisional Structure as an Enabling Device, A Longitudinal Study of Discretionary Cash as a Strategic Resource," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 718-733. CrossRef
  41. Sah, R. K. 1991. "Fallibility in Human Organizations and Political Systems," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 67-88. CrossRef
  42. Sheard, P. 1989. "The Main Bank System and Corporate Monitoring and Control in Japan," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 399-422. CrossRef
  43. Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. 1991. "Takeovers in the 1960s and the 1980s, Evidence and Implications," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, no. S2, pp. 51-59. CrossRef
  44. Walsh, J. P. and R. Kosnik. 1993. "Corporate Raiders and their Disciplinary Role in the Market for Corporate Control," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 671-700. CrossRef
  45. Walton, R. E. 1985. "From Control to Commitment in the Workplace," Harvard Business Review, pp. 77-84.
  46. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
  47. Williamson, O. E. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
  48. Zysman, J. 1983. Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.