본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title
1 Test for the Reflection in Signaling Effect of the Foreign Exchange Intervention with the Threshold of Economic Fundamental: An International Comparison Focusing on Asymmetric Information and Lucas Critique  / 2013 /  Global Business Administration Review  / vol.10, no.2, pp.31 / 

10.17092/jibr.2013.10.2.31

2 Effects of exchange rate volatility on bilateral import performance of Vietnam: A dynamic Generalised method of Moments panel approach  / 2019 /  International Economic Journal  / vol.33, no.1, pp.88 / 

10.1080/10168737.2019.1571525

3 Impact of exchange rates on exports from India’s sub-national economies  / 2019 /  South Asian Journal of Business Studies  / vol.8, no.2, pp.166 / 

10.1108/SAJBS-09-2018-0100

4 Does Exchange Rate Volatility Dampen Imports? Commodity-Level Evidence From India  / 2019 /  International Economic Journal pp.1 / 

10.1080/10168737.2019.1630467

5 Asymmetric effect of consumption expenditure on import function in Saudi Arabia  / 2024 /  The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development pp.1 / 

10.1080/09638199.2024.2433008

6 Effects of Global Oil Price on Exchange Rate, Trade Balance, and Reserves in Nigeria: A Frequency Domain Causality Approach  / 2019 /  Journal of Risk and Financial Management  / vol.12, no.1, pp.43 / 

10.3390/jrfm12010043

7 Petrol Fiyatları ve Döviz Kuru Volatilitesinin Türkiye’nin Dış Ticaretindeki Taşımacılık Faaliyetleri Üzerinde Etkileri  / 2023 /  Maliye Finans Yazıları no.119, pp.39 / 

10.33203/mfy.1152324

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of exchange rate volatility on exports among 14 Asia Pacific countries, where various measures to raise the intra-region trade are being implemented. Specifically, this paper estimates a gravity model, in which the dependent variable is the product of the exports of two trading countries. In addition, it also estimates a unilateral exports model, in which the dependent variable is not the product of the exports of two trading countries but the exports from one country to another. By doing this, the depreciation rate of the exporting country's currency value can be included as one of the explanatory variables affecting the volume of exports. As the explanatory variables of the export volume, the gravity model adopts the product of the GDPs of two trading counties, their bilateral exchange rate volatility, their distance, a time trend and dummies for the share of the border line, the use of the same language, and the APEC membership. In the case of the unilateral exports model, the product of the GDPs is replaced by the GDP of the importing country, and the depreciation rate of the exporting country's currency value is dded. In addition, considering that the export volume will also depend on various onditions of the exporting country, dummies for exporting countries are also included as an explanatory variable. The empirical tests, using annual data for the period from 1980 to 2002, detect a significant negative impact of exchange rate volatility on the volume of exports. In addition, various tests using the data for sub-sample periods indicate that the negative impact had been weakened since 1989, when APEC had launched, and surged again from 1997, when the Asian financial crisis broke out. This finding implies that the impact of exchange rate volatility is time-dependent and that it is significantlynegative at least in the present time. This phenomenon is noticed regardless which estimation model is adopted. In addition, the test results show that the GDP of the importing country, the depreciation of the exporting country's currency value, the use of the same language and the membership of APEC have positive impacts on exports, while the distance between trading countries have negative impacts. Finally, it turns out that the negative impact of exchange rate volatility is much weaker among OECD countries than among non-OECD counties.

JEL classification: F15, F18, F31

Keywords

Exchange Rate Volatility, Export, Asia Pacific Region, APEC, Gravity Model

Language

English

References

  1. Akhtar, M. A. and A. S. Hilton. 1984. "Effects of exchange rate uncertainty on German and U.S. trade," Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, vol. 9, pp. 7-16.
  2. Arize, Augustine C., Osang, Thomas and Daniel J. Slottje. 2000. "Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade, evidence from thirteen LDC's," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 10-17. CrossRef
  3. Aristotelous, K. 2001. "Exchange-rate volatility, exchabge-rate regime, and trade volume: evidence from the UK-US export function (1889-1999)," Economics Letters, vol. 72, pp. 87-94. CrossRef
  4. Asseery, A. and D. A. Peel. 1991. "The effects of exchange rate volatility on exports: Some new estimates," Economics Letters, vol. 37, pp. 173-177. CrossRef
  5. Baak, S. J., Al-Mahmood, A. and S. Vixathep. 2003. Exchange rate volatility and exports from East Asian countries to Japan and the U.S. International Development Series 2003-2. International University of Japan.
  6. Bacchetta, Philippe and Eric van Wincoop. 2000. "Does exchange-rate stability increase trade and welfare?" The American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1093-1109. CrossRef
  7. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen and Sayeed Payesteh. 1993. "Does exchange rate volatility deter trade volume of LDCs?" Journal of Economic Development, vol. 18, pp. 189-205.
  8. Baum, Christopher F., Caglayan, Mustafa and Neslihan Ozkan. 2001. "Exchange rate effects on the volume of trade flows: an empirical analysis employing high-frequency data," Manuscript. Boston College.
  9. Bredin, D., Fountas, S. and E. Murphy. 2003. "An empirical analysis of short-run and long-run Irish export functions: does exchange rate volatility matter?" International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 193-208. CrossRef
  10. Chowdhury, A. 1993. "Does exchange rate volatility depress trade flows? Evidence from error-correction models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 75, pp. 700-706. CrossRef
  11. Cote, A. 1994. "Exchange rate volatility and trade: A survey," Working paper 94-5. Bank of Canada.
  12. Dell'Ariccia, G. 1999. "Exchange rate fluctuations and trade flows, evidence from the European Union," IMF Staff Papers no. 46, pp. 315-331.
  13. De Grauwe, P. 1988. "Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in growth of international trade," IMF Staff Papers no. 35, pp. 63-84. CrossRef
  14. Doganlar, M. 2002. "Estimating the impact of exchange rate volatility on exports: evidence from Asian countries," Applied Economic Letters, vol. 9, pp. 859-863.
  15. Doroodian, K. 1999. "Does exchange rate volatility deter international trade in developing countries?" Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 10, pp. 465-474. CrossRef
  16. Doyle, E. 2001. "Exchange rate volatility and Irish-UK trade," 1979-1992, Applied Economics, vol. 33, pp. 249-265. CrossRef
  17. Eichengreen, B. and D. Irwin. 1996. "The role of history in bilateral trade flows," NBER Working Paper no. 5565.
  18. Frankel, J. A. and S. J. Wei. 1994. "Yen bloc or dollar bloc? Exchange rate policies of the East Asian economies," In Ito, T and A. O. Krueger eds. Macroeconomic linkage: savings, exchange rates, and capital flows. NBER-East Asia seminar on economics. vol 3. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge.
  19. Hook. L. S. and T. H. "Boon. 2000. Real exchange rate volatility and the Malaysian exports to its major trading partners," Working paper. Faculty of Economics and Management. University Putra Malaysia.
  20. Hooper, Peter and Steven Kohlhagen. 1978. "The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the prices and volume of international trade," Journal of International Economics, vol. 8, pp. 483-511. CrossRef
  21. Kim, K. and W. Lee. 1996. "The impact of Korea's exchange rate volatility on Korean trade," Asian Economic Journal, vol. 10, pp. 45-60. CrossRef
  22. Kim, T. J. and J. W. Ryou. 2001. "The optimal currency basket and the currency bloc in Asia," Economic Papers, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 194-216.
  23. Kwan, C. H. 2000. "The possibility of forming a yen bloc revisited," ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 218-232.
  24. Kroner, Kenneth F. and William D. Lastrapes. 1993. "The impact of exchange rate volatility on international trade, Reduced form estimates using the GARCH-in-Mean Model," Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 12, pp. 298-318. CrossRef
  25. Peree, E. and A. Steinherr. 1989. "Exchange rate uncertainty and foreign trade," European Economic Review, vol. 33, pp. 1241-1264.
  26. Rajan, R. S. 2000. "Currency basket regimes for Southeast Asia: the worst system with exception of all others," Policy Discussion Paper no. 0028, Australia: Center for International Economic Studies. Adelaide University.
  27. Rajan, R. S. 2002. "Exchange Rate Policy Options for Post-crisis Southeast Asia: Is There a Case for Currency Baskets?," World Economy, January 2002, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 137-163.
  28. Rose, A. K. 1999. "One money, one market: estimating the effect of common currencies on trade," NBER Working Paper no. 7432.
  29. Secru, Piet and Raman Uppal. 2000. Exchange Rate Volatility, Trade, Capital Flows under Alternative Exchange Rate Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Williamson, John. 1999. "The case for a common basket peg for East Asian currencies," In S. Collignon and J. Pisani_Ferri eds. Exchange rate policies in Asian emerging countries. London: Routledge Press.