본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

China is top FDI destination for Korean Textile firms. This paper, using survey data for 41 Korean textile firms invested in China, measured their performance and analysed its determinants. Regression results show that localization of the business management, level of wages, the investment-to-employee ratio, ratio of raw materials sourced from Korea, and export ratio of the parent company have positive relations with the firm's performance. On the contrary, domestic sales (i.e. sales within China) ratio is not significantly related with the performance. This survey also reveals some difficulties which Korean-invested textile firms in China usually face in the operation stages of investment. The biggest trouble is the rapid rise of production cost, and many firms feel growing competition from local competitors and have difficulties with entering local market. They also suffer from lack of skilled workers and high ratio of labor turnover. Besides, they have trouble financing operation funds in China. Meanwhile, according to the survey result, the ratio of local procurement of raw materials continues to rise rapidly, being expected to amount 77 percent within the next few years. This indicates that the export induction effect of FDI would be in a sharp decline, possibly resulting in enlargement of Korean textile industry's trade deficit with China.

JEL classification: F21, L67, P2

Keywords

Textile, FDI, China, Investment Performance, Management Practices, Trade

Language

Korean

References

  1. Ahn, Y. D. 1999. A Study on Improvement of National Competitiveness in Korea. Seoul: Bee Bong. (in Korean)
  2. Park, E. B. and E. J. Kim. 2002. “A Study on Localization Strategy of Korean Enterprises in China Market: A Case Study of Leading Electronic Corporations,” Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-22. (in Korean)
  3. Kim, Y. G. and B. S. Han. 1997. “Comparative Assessment on Localization Strategy of Korean Consumer Electronics Sector in USA and China: A Case Study of LG Electronics,” Proceedings of Academic Conference, vol. 1997, no. 4, pp. 105-137. (in Korean)
  4. Park, J. D. and J. S. Ahn. 2002. “Northeast Asian Economic Cooperation of the 21st Century,” Policy References 2002-06, Seoul: Korea Development Institute. (in Korean)
  5. Park, C. I. 2003. Local Financing in China: Institutional Environments, Current Issues, and Prospects. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute. (in Korean)
  6. Park, H. 2004. “The new way out of the Korean textile industry, according to a rapid rise of China,” Issue paper 2004-168, pp. 55-66, Seoul: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade. (in Korean)
  7. Paik, G.-H. et al. 2002. “Localization of the Business Management of Korean Foreign Investment Enterprises in China,” Policy Analysis 02-23, pp. 33-81, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  8. Booz & Allen Hamilton. 1997. Revitalizing the Korean economy toward the 21st century. pp. 27-33, Seoul: Maekyung Publishing. (in Korean)
  9. Lee, C. S. 2003. “The Linkage between FDI and Trade: Focusing on Korea's FDI into China and Japan's FDI into Korea,” Policy Analysis 02-12, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  10. Lee, C.-G. 2003. "Growth of Textile Industries of China and North Korea and Its Implications for Korea,” Policy References 03-11, pp. 19-21, Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute. (in Korean)
  11. The Federation of Korean Industries. 2003. “Comparative Analysis of the Investment Environments in Ansan Industrial Complex of Korrea and QingDao Industrial Complex in China,” Press Release, 1 December. pp. 1-10. Seoul: The Federation of Korean Industries. (in Korean)
  12. The Federation of Korean Industries. 2004. “A Study on the Investment of Korean Enterprise with China,” CER-2004-28, pp. 18-34, Seoul: The Federation of Korean Industries. (in Korean)
  13. Cho, H. J. 2002. "Effects of the Liberalization of Distribution Industry in China and Korea's Strategy," Policy Analysis 02-16, pp. 180-192, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy
  14. Cho, H. J., Youn, M. S. and B. W. Kim. 2004. “Investment of Manufacturing Enterprises in Incheon with China and Its Implications for Policy of Incheon City,” Research and Service Report, pp. 35-135, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  15. Jee, M. S., Nam, Y.-S., Cho, H.-J., Lee, H. S. and E.-G. Kim. 2004. “Korean firms invested in China: Survey of management practices and implications,” Policy Analysis 04-14, pp. 48-146, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  16. Korea International Trade Association. 2003. “A Survey on Korean Firms' Strategy in China: Focused on Current Situation of Trade and Employment,” Policy Analysis 03-1-18, pp. 10-14, Seoul: Korea International Trade Association. (in Korean)
  17. Korea International Trade Association. 2004. “Forecasting and Estimation to Mid and Long Term Trade with China,” Policy Analysis, pp. 22-32, Seoul: Korea International Trade Association. (in Korean)
  18. The Export-Import Bank of Korea. 2004. “Status Analysis of Corporative Management of Korean Corporations in China,” Policy Analysis 03-01, pp. 20-67, Seoul: The Export-Import Bank of Korea. (in Korean)
  19. Korea International Trade Association. Korea Trade Statistics, Available at www.kita.net CrossRef
  20. The Export-Import Bank of Korea. Foreign Investment Statistics, Available at www.koreaexim.go.kr CrossRef
  21. Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. 2004. "A Study on the Corporative Management of Korean Enterprises in China," pp. 1-11, Seoul: Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. (in Korean)
  22. Lu, Xiaoyong. 2004. “International Investment Theory and Direct Investment in China of Advanced Countries”, Beijing: beijing science publishing house, pp. 154-155. (in Chinese)