본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Abstract

This paper tests the mean reverting property of current account in the financial crisis-affected 5 counties of southeast Asia using nonlinear unit root tests of Park and shintani(2004). Our approach is based on the idea that a conventional unit root test has lower power in detecting the nonlinear mean reverting behavior if the current account follows a nonlinear mean reversion process. We obtained following empirical results. First, for the pre-crisis period (1981Q1-1996Q4), the current accounts of Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines are mean-reverting but those of Korea and Thailand are not mean-reverting. Second, for the full sample period (1981Q1-2003Q4), the ADF test fails to reject the unit root of the current account in all countries except Philippines. However, unit root is rejected in favor of nonlinear mean reversion except Thailand. This nonlinear unit root test result implies that crisis-affected Asian countries except Thailand have sustainable paths of current accounts. Third, when the current accounts of East Asian countries are nonlinear mean-reverting, the mean reverting process can be well described by the ESTAR model, instead of the DTAR or DLSTAR model. The nonlinear unit root test results imply smooth nonlinear mean-reversion behaviors of East Asian current accounts. Finally, the shape of estimated impulse response functions becomes steeper as the size of shock increases, which is the very characteristic of the nonlinear process.

JEL classification: F30, F32

Keywords

Current Account, Solvency, Nonlinear Unit Root Test, Asian Economies

Language

English

References

  1. Caner, M. and B.E. Hansen. 2001. "Threshold autoregression with a unit root," Econometrica, vol. 69, pp. 1555-1596. CrossRef
  2. Chang, Y. 2002. "Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency," Journal of Econometrics, vol. 110, pp. 261-292. CrossRef
  3. Chang, Y. and W. Song. 2005. "Unit root tests for panels in the presence of short-run and long-run dependencies: nonlinear IV approach with fixed N and large T," Working Paper. Rice university.
  4. Fountas, S. and J. L. Wu. 1999. "Are the U.S. current account deficits really sustainable?" International Economic Journal, vol. 13, pp. 51-58. CrossRef
  5. Gandolfo, G. 1981. Quantitative analysis and econometric estimation of continuous time dynamic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  6. Ghosh, A. 1995. "International capital mobility amongst the major industrialized countries, too much or too little?" Economic Journal, vol. 105, pp. 107-128. CrossRef
  7. Ghosh, A. and J. D. Ostry. 1995. "The current account in developing countries: a perspectives from the consumption smoothing approach," World Bank Economic Review, vol. 9, pp. 305-333. CrossRef
  8. Hamam, M. M. 1995. Budget deficits and current account balances: a theoretical and an empirical investigation of their links in the United States and the United Kingdom. Ph.D. Dissertation. Washington, D.C.: The American University.
  9. Hernandez, L. and P. J. Montiel. 2003. "Post-crisis exchange rates policies in five asian countries, Filling in the hollow middle?" Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, vol. 17, pp. 336-369. CrossRef
  10. Holman, J. A. 2001. "Is the Large US Current Account Deficit Sustainable?" Economic Review, vol, 2001 (First Quarter), pp. 5-23. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  11. Husted, S. 1992. "The emerging U.S. current account deficit in the 1980s: A cointegration analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 74, pp. 159-166. CrossRef
  12. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Y. Shin. 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, vol. 115, pp. 53-74.
  13. Lau, E., Baharumshah, A. and C. Haw. 2004. "Current account: mean-reverting or random walk behavior?" Japan and the World Economy. Forthcoming.
  14. MacKinnon, J. G. 1996. "Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests," Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 11, pp. 601-618. CrossRef
  15. Mann, C. L. 1999. Is the US Trade Deficit Sustainable? Washington. D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
  16. Mann, C. L. 2002. "Perspectives on the U.S. current account deficit and sustainability," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, pp. 131-152. CrossRef
  17. Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. and A. Razin. 1996. "Sustainability of Persistent Current Account Deficits," Working Paper no. 5467. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
  18. Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff. 1994. "The Intertemporal Approach to the Current Account," NBER Working Paper no. 4893.
  19. Ostry, J. D. 1997. "Current account imbalances in ASEAN Countries: are they a problem?" IMF Working Paper no. 51.
  20. Park, J. Y. and M. Shintani. 2004. "Testing for a unit root against smooth transition autogressive models," Manuscript.
  21. Razin, A. 1995. "The dynamic optimizing approach to the current account: Theory and evidence," In Kenen, P. B. ed. Understanding Interdependence: The Macroeconomics of the Open Economy, pp. 169-198. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  22. Sachs, J. D. 1981. "The current account and macroeconomic adjustment in the 1970s," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1981, no. 1, pp. 201-268. CrossRef
  23. Sheffrin, S. M. and W.T. Woo. 1990. "Present value tests of an intertemporal model of the current account," Journal of International Economics, vol. 29, pp. 237-253. CrossRef
  24. Wu, J. L. 2000. "Mean reversion of the current account: Evidence from the panel data unit-root test," Economics Letters, vol. 66, pp. 215-222. CrossRef