본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This study explores alternative ways toward the East Asian monetary union, focusing on the effect of monetary integration on bilateral trade. For this purpose, we analyze with gravity model changes of the bilateral trade among countries of EU, NAFTA, and East Asia. A distinctive feature of this model is that it includes the dummy variables that show the cultural intimacy among North-East Asian countries, Asian NIEs countries, and East Asian countries (North-East Asian and ASEAN countries). We discovered that bilateral trade increased at a highest level among East Asian countries than the other two cases. This result suggests that the once-and-for-all strategy to develop an East Asian monetary union including North-East Asian and ASEAN countries would be more efficient than the multitrack strategy that forms the monetary union of North-East Asian countries in the first place and then tries to extend it to ASEAN countries.

JEL classification: C22, E63, F42, O47

Keywords

Monetary Integration, East Asian Monetary Union, Gravity Model, Trade Dependence Index, Trade Intensity Index

Language

Korean

References

  1. Ko, M.-C. 2006. “A Study of the Effect of East Asian Monetary Integration: Focusing on the Effect of EMU on bilateral trade,” Proceedings of 2006 Economics Joint Conference. (in Korean)
  2. Kim, M.-A. 2004. “Panel Analysis on Trade and Output Effects of EMU,” Korea Trade Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 5-21. (in Korean)
  3. Kim, I.-C. 2001. “Feasibility of Financial Integration in East Asia,” Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 217-236. (in Korean)
  4. Kim, T. J. and J. W. Ryou. 2000. “A Study on the Optimal Currency Basket and Currency Bloc in Asia,” Economic Analysis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 164-193. (in Korean)
  5. Park, S.-H. 2001. “Economic Integration in East Asia: Finding a Balance between Regionalism and Multilateralism,” Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187-216. (in Korean)
  6. Park, S.-H. and H. C. Kim. 2004. “Alternative paths of East Asian Monetary Integration in Light of European Economic and Monetary Union,” Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 145-194. (in Korean)
  7. Shin, K. H., Wnag, Y. J. and J. W. Lee. 2003. “The Political Economy of Monetary Integration in East Asia,” Policy Analysis 03-01, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  8. Lee, H. S., Lee, J.-W., Shin, K. H. and Y. J. Wang. 2004. “An Analysis on Trade Rules of Korea, Japan and China: Implications on an FTA among Three Countries,” Policy Analyses 04-02, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  9. Cho, B. T. and M. C. Ko. 2005. “A Study of the Necessity of East-Asian Financial Cooperation System: Focusing on the Effect of Exchange Rate Instabilities on Bilateral Trade,” Kukje Kyungje Yongu, vol. 11, pp. 155-180. (in Korean)
  10. Choi, C. K. 1999. “Launching Euro and Possibilities of Yen Bloc Formation: Its Impact on Korean Economy,” Korean Journal of EU Studies, vol. 4, pp. 72-113. (in Korean)
  11. Alesina, A., R. J. Barro and S. Tenreyro. 2002. "Optimal Currency Areas." NBER Working Paper, No. 9072. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen. 1997. "Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion? Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA." In T. Ito and A. O. Krueger eds. Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Dell'Ariccia, G. 1998. "Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Trade Flows: Evidence from the European Union." IMF Working Paper 98/107.
  14. Eichengreen, B. 2003. "What to Do with the Chiang Mai Initiative." Asian Economic Papers, vol. 2, pp.1-49. CrossRef
  15. Frankel, J. A. and S. J. Wei. 1993. "Trade Blocs and Currency Blocs." NBER Working Paper, no. 4335.
  16. Frankel, J. A. and A. Rose. 2002. "An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income." Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, pp. 437-466. CrossRef
  17. Goto, J. and K. Hamada. 1994. "Economic Preconditions for Asian Regional Integration." In T. Ito and A. O. Krueger eds. Macroeocnomic Linkage: Savings, Exchange Rates and Capital Flows. University of Chicago Press.
  18. Kojima, K. 1976. "Economic Integration in the Asian Pacific Area." Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, vol. 16, pp. 1-16.
  19. Krugman, P. 1990. "Policy Problems of a Monetary Union." In P. De Grauwe and L. Papademos eds. The European Monetary System in the 1990s. Longman.
  20. Kwan, C. H. 1998. "The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas and the Possibility of Forming a Yen Bloc in Asia." Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 9, pp. 555-580. CrossRef
  21. Moon, W. S., Y. S. Rhee, and D. R. Yoon. 2000. "Asian Monetary Cooperation: A Search for Regional Monetary Stability in the Post Euro and the Post Asian Crisis Era." Economic Papers, vol. 3, pp. 159-193.
  22. Park, Y. C. 2005. "Prospects for Regional Monetary and Financial Integration in East Asia." Summer Economic Policy Seminar of the Korean International Economic Association.
  23. Rose, A. K. 1999. "One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade." NBER Working Paper no. 7432. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  24. Rose, A. K. and C. Engel. 2002. "Currency Unions and International Integration." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 34, pp. 1067-1089. CrossRef
  25. Thom, R. and B. Walsh. 2002. "The Effect of a Currency Union on Trade: Lessons from the Irish Experience." European Economic Review, vol. 46, pp. 1111-1123. CrossRef