본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This paper estimates the economic effects of China's FTAs with ASEAN, Chile, Pakistan, ANZ, GCC, Hong Kong, Korea, and Korea and Japan, and compares libeThis paper estimates the economic effects of China's FTAs with ASEAN, Chile, Pakistan, ANZ, GCC, Hong Kong, Korea, and Korea and Japan, and compares liberalization gains from each. This paper is differentiated from other studies in that the errors in measurement arising from changes in databases resulting from China's WTO accession are controlled. The major findings and implications of this paper are as follows. First, CGE analyses ignoring the impacts of China's accession to the WTO overestimate China's economic benefits (China-ASEAN: 61%; China-Hong Kong: 112%; China-Korea: 42%; China-Japan-Korea: 25%). Second, CGE analyses ignoring the impacts of China's accession to the WTO overestimate economic benefits for partner countries (China-ASEAN: 59%; China-Hong Kong: 119%), whereas they are underestimated in the case of the China-Korea FTA (42%) and the China-Japan-Korea FTA (25%). The reason for underestimation can be explained by the production network based on vertical division of labor of production processes (fragmentation) in the East Asia. Third, the impacts of China's WTO accession on the Chinese economy are far greater than those of China's FTAs with considering countries. Fourth, the gains created from China's FTA policies are very small or almost negligible. Combining the third and fourth implications, it can be said that China continues to enjoy economic gains from free trade governed by multilateral liberalization of institutions and market forces. This also implies that China is likely to use FTA policy as a strategic tool to thwart possible changes in international order away from the present free-trade and multilateral system, which prevent China from sustainable realization of economic gains from trade.

JEL classification: F13, F15, F17, F51, F59

Keywords

China, FTA, Regionalism, CGE

Language

Korean

References

  1. Lee, C.-K., Lee, I.-K., Yeo, J. and H.-J. Cho. 2006. “China's FTA strategy and its policy implications,” Policy Analysis 06-11, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. (in Korean)
  2. Lee, C. S. 2007a. “Distribution and Sources of Gains from DDA Liberalization,” Kukje Kyungje Yongu, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 27-52. (in Korean)
  3. Lee, C. S. 2007b. “Trade Diversion Effects of Regional Integration: East Asia versus the Americas,” Mimeo. (in Korean)
  4. Abraham, F. and J. Van Hove. 2005."The Rise of China: Prospects of Regional Trade Policy," Review of World Economics, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 486-509.
  5. Anderson, K. 1997. "On the Complexities of China's WTO Accession," The World Economy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 749-772. CrossRef
  6. Anderson, K., W. Martin and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2006. "Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What Is at Stake for Developing Countries," The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 169-195. CrossRef
  7. Antkiewicz, A. and J. Whalley. 2005. "China's New Regional Trade Agreements," The World Economy, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1539-1557. CrossRef
  8. Eichengreen, B. 2006. "China, Asia and the World Economy: The Implications of an Emerging Asian Core and Periphery," China & World Economy, vol. 14 no. 3, pp. 1-18.
  9. Ianchovichina, E. and W. Martin. 2006. "Trade Impacts of China's World Trade Organization Access," Asian Economic Policy Review, vol, 1, no. 1, pp. 45-65. CrossRef
  10. Ianchovichina, E. and R. McDougal. 2001. "Theoretical Structure of Dynamic GTAP," GTAP Technical Paper No. 17.
  11. Ianchovichina, E. and T. L. Walmsley. 2005. "Impact of China's WTO Accession on East Asia," Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 261-277. CrossRef
  12. Francois, J. and B. McDonald. 1996. "Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model," GTAP Technical Paper No. 7.
  13. Francois, J. and D. Spinanger. 2004. "Regulated Efficiency, World Trade organization Accession, and the Motor Vehicle Sector in China," World Bank Economic Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 85-104.
  14. Hertel, T. W. and M. E. Tsigas. 1997. "Structure of GTAP," in T. W. Hertel ed. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Lee, H., Roland-Holst, D. and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2004."China’s Emergence in East Asia under Alternative Trading Arrangements," Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 697-712. CrossRef
  16. Rodrik, D. 2006."What's So Special about China's Exports?" China & World Economy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1-19.
  17. Sallly, R. 2006. "Free Trade Agreements and the Prospects for Regional Integration in East Asia," Asian Economic Policy Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 306-321.
  18. Song, H. 2006. "Global Quota System and China's Textile and Clothing Industry," China & World Economy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 78-92. CrossRef
  19. Tan, K. S. and H. E. Khor. 2006. "China's Changing Economic Structure and Implications for Regional Patterns of Trade, Production and Integration," China & World Economy vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1-19.
  20. Tongzon, J. L. 2005. "ASEAN-China Free Trade Area: A Bane or Boon for ASEAN Countries?" The World Economy, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 191-210.
  21. van der Mensbrugghe, D. 2005. "LINKAGE Technical Reference Document: Version 6," World Bank.
  22. Walmsley, T. L. 2000. "China's Accession to the WTO: Timing is Everything," GTAP Staff Paper.
  23. Walmsley, T. L., Hertel, T. and E. Ianchovichina. 2005. "Assessing the Impact of China's WTO Accession on Investment," Pacific Economic Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 315-319.
  24. Yang, Y. 2006. "China's Integration into the World Economy: Implications for Developing Countries," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40-56. CrossRef