본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
kiep logo

Contents

Citation

Citation
No Title

Abstract

This paper empirically confronts one explanation of spreading regionalism with the European experience. The domino theory asserts that forming a preferential trade area, or deepening an existing one, produces trade diversion that generates new political-economy forces in third nations as third-nation exporters seek to redress the new discrimination and profit from newly deepened preferences. The pressure increases with the bloc’s size, yet bloc size depends upon how many nations join, so a single incidence of regionalism may trigger several rounds of membership requests from nations that were previously happy to stay out. We estimate a time-series of EU trade creation and diversion over the last five decades and use these to estimate a model of EU membership demands. The results provide broad support for the model and show that trade diversion has a more powerful impact on membership than trade creation.

JEL classification: F13, F15

Keywords

Domino Theory, Regionalism, FTAs

Language

English

References

  1. Aghion, P., Antras, P. and E. Helpman. 2004. "Negotiating Free Trade," NBER Working Paper no. 10721. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Anderson, K., and R. Blackhurst. 1993. "Introduction and Summary," in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst eds. Regional Integration and the Global Trading System. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  3. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2003. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, vol. 64, pp. 29-63. CrossRef
  4. Baldwin, Richard. 1993a. "A Domino Theory of Regionalism," NBER WP 4465. Published as: Baldwin, Richard E. 1995. in Baldwin, Haaparanta and Kiander eds. Expanding membership of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Republished as Chapter 23 (pp. 479-502) in J. Bhagwati, P. Krishna, and A. Panagariya. 1999. Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  5. Baldwin, Richard. 1993b. "Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers," GIIS mimeo available by email. (Geneva)
  6. Baldwin, Richard. 1994. "Towards an integrated Europe," CEPR. (London)
  7. Baldwin, Richard. 1995. "The Domino Theory of Regionalism," in Baldwin, Haaparanta and Kiander eds. Expanding membership of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Baldwin, Richard. 1997. "The Caues of Regionalism," The World Economy, vol. 20, no, 7, pp. 865-888. CrossRef
  9. Baldwin, Richard. 2000. "Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trading System," in Brookings Trade Forum, S. Collins and D. Rodrik eds., pp. 237-293. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. CrossRef
  10. Baldwin, Richard and Charles Wyplosz. 2006. The Economics of European Integration, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill.
  11. Bergsten, F. 1996a. "Competitive Liberalisation and Global Free Trade: A Vision for the Early 21st Century," Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
  12. Bergsten, F. 1996b. "Open Regionalism," Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
  13. Bergstrand, J. and S. Baier. 2004. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 29-63. (October) CrossRef
  14. Bhagwati, J. 1993. "Regionalism and Multilateralism: An overview," in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst eds. Regional Integration and the Global Trading System. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  15. Bond, Eric W. and Constantinos Syropolous. 1996. "The Size of Trading Blocs, Market Power and World Welfare Effects," Journal of International Economics, vol. 40, pp. 411-437. CrossRef
  16. Cheng, I. and H. Wall. 2005. "Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 49-63.
  17. Dorrucci. E., Firpo, S., Fratzscher, M., and F. P. Mongelli. 2003. "What Lessons for Latin America from European Institutional and Economic Integration?" in P. van der Haegen and J. Vinals eds. Regional Integration in Europe and Latin America - Monetary and Financial Aspects, pp. 171-218. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  18. Fernandez, Raquel and Janathan Portes. 1998. "Returns to Regionalism: An Analysis of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements," World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 197-220. Oxford University Press (May) CrossRef
  19. Freund, C. 2000. "Different Paths to Free Trade, The Gains from Regionalism," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1317-1341. CrossRef
  20. Grossman, G. and E. Helpman. 1995. "The Politics of Free-Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 667-690.
  21. Holmes, Tammy. 2005. "What Drives Regional Trade Agreements that Work?" HEI Working Paper, No. 07/2005. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.
  22. Hufbauer, G. 1989. "Background Paper for The Free Trade Debate," Reports of the 20th Century Fund Task Force on the Future of American Trade Policy. New York: Priority Press.
  23. Katz, E. 2001. "Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation," Political Analysis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 379-384. CrossRef
  24. Krishna, P. 1998. "Regionalism and Multilateralism, A Political Economy Approach," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 227-250. (February) CrossRef
  25. Krugman, Paul. 1993. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism: Analytic Notes," in De Melo, J. and A. Panagariya eds. New Dimensions in Regional Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for CEPR.
  26. Lawrence, R. 1996. Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deeper Integration. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
  27. Levy, Philip. 1997. "A Political-Economic Analysis of Free-Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, vol. 87, pp. 506-519.
  28. Mansfield, E. D. and E. Reinhardt. 2003. "Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trade Agreements," International Organization, vol. 57, pp. 829-862. CrossRef
  29. Maskus, K. and J. S. Wilson eds. 2001. Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can it Be Done? Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
  30. Mclaren, J. 2002. "A Theory of Insidious Regionalism," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 571-608. CrossRef
  31. Neal, L. and D. Barbezat. 1998. "The Economics of European Union and the Economies of Europe," Oxford University Press.
  32. Panagariya, A. 1996. "APEC and the United States," CIES DP. University of Adelaide.
  33. Rieder, R. 2006. "Playing Dominoes in Europe: An Empirical Analysis of the Domino Theory for the EU, 1962-2004," HEI Working Paper, No. 11/2006. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.
  34. Sapir, A. 1997. "Domino effects in Western European Trade, 1960-1992." CEPR DP (London). Published in 2001 as "Domino effects in Western European regional trade, 1960-92," European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 17, p. 386.
  35. Viner, J. 1950. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  36. Whalley, J. 1993. "Regional Trade Arrangements in North America: CUSTA and NAFTA," in J. De Melo and A. Panagariya eds. New Dimensions in Regional Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for CEPR. CrossRef
  37. Whalley, J. 1996. "Why do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements," NBER WP 5552. Cambridge.
  38. Winters, A. 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1687. Washington DC.
  39. Wu, J. P. 2004. "Measuring and Explaining Levels of Regional Economic Integration," ZEI Working Paper B12/2004. Bonn: Centre for European Integration Studies.
  40. Yi, S. 1996. "Endogenous Formation of Customs Unions under Imperfect Competition, Open Regionalism is Good," Journal of International Economics, vol. 41, pp. 151-175. CrossRef